.story-content span,.story-content p,.story-content div{color:#000!important;font-family:‘open sans‘,Arial!important;font-size:15px!important} span.p-content div[id^=”div-gpt”]{line-height:0;font-size:0}

2018 has again seen unable to meet rising demand for the mineral. This has again drawn attention to the sector, another reason being the release of a report by a government committee which recommends commercial mining. PARTHA SARATHI BHATTACHARYA, a member of this panel and a former chairman of government-owned Coal India, speaks to Subhomoy Bhattacharjee. Edited excerpts:

Q: There are two ways to describe Coal India's finances. From FY13 to FY18, profit declined by over 60 per cent. The other description is that the first quarter (Q1) of FY19 saw net profit rising by 61 per cent.

A: The decline in net profit margin from around 20 per cent in FY13 to five per cent in FY18 is probably due to the revision of coal grades by the coal controller's office. Essentially, more grades of coal were being sold cheaper. Also, the introduction of independent sampling and analysis by the CIMFR and, finally, the lesser share of coal sold through e-auction. The lower share meant a drop in the e-auction premium over the period. It happened primarily due to softening of global prices.

The same trends have got reversed recently, due to which there is a rise in net profit — possibly also due to the low base of Q1 in FY18).

Q: and the government, too, have recently asked for a revision of the earlier one billion tonnes per annum target. How do you read this?

A: This target for by FY20 was neither feasible nor required. A realistic resetting is overdue. Expecting to grow in excess of six-seven per cent annually over a longer period of time is not feasible and depending on such expectation is, in fact, detrimental to the interest of consumers. The power capacities stranded for want of coal is a glaring testimony to the setting of such unrealistic targets.

Q: CIL is a large company, headed by a puny ministry. Hasn't this led to sub-optimal results for the company in terms of investment, management control and so on? In retrospect, what would have been the impact if the Government of India had taken a different role in the 1970s, with an increased role for the coal regulator and competition among smaller state-owned coal companies?

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

A: The historical contradictions inherent in the policy framework were largely responsible for the decade-long shortage of domestic coal. It was apparent to policymakers way in the early 1990s, through the report of a government-appointed committee, that once the power sector accelerates capacity addition through private participation, adding more players for would become imperative. This was the basis for the statutory amendment in 1993 that led to identification and allocation of more than 200 blocks for mining to end-users. Not many successful instances of end-users mining their coal is on record globally. Predictably, it didn't succeed in India as well. The share of such production always remained less than seven-eight per cent. It did not create much of a crisis during the 15-year period from 1992 to 2007 since power sector growth remained moderate.

Q: What should be the policy regarding commercial coal mining?

A: Reforms in the power sector led to growth rising three-fold during 2007-12. Anything short of faster opening up of the coal sector to commercial mining was inadequate as a policy response. Unfortunately, neither policymakers nor large power consumers realised this requirement. The myopic response considered by all stakeholders was to thrust irrational targets of production and supply of coal on The result is there for everyone to see.

Commercial mining has since been allowed and will hopefully be fast-tracked. If this endeavour succeeds, the coal market will mature and shortages become history, hopefully over the next five years.

Q: Why haven't CIL's share prices given a fair return to its investors?

A: CIL shares have yielded return to investors more by way of dividends than capital appreciation. CIL has all the strength to counter competition. The share price is expected to witness capital appreciation once CIL, exposed to competition, takes more effective measures to drive efficiency and coal quality. One of those would be commercial mining. It will help the market to mature, leave buyers with choices for sourcing coal. Shortages will be a matter of the past and CIL, with appropriate empowerment, will secure its position as the undisputed numero uno globally.

Just-released report names Cannabis Stock of the Year for 2019! Their last pick has seen a +1,200% return since he released it!

This stock has all of the makings of the next great cannabis stock – early-mover advantage, international exposure and influential partnerships, plus it has a product that is unlike anything else on the market…

You will also receive a free, weekly newsletter to stay on top of the latest industry trends, read analysis on promising cannabis stocks, and more. Click here to receive your Free Report immediately!